Wednesday, July 20, 2011

About the debt ceiling negotiations...

I'm hoping that Americans are well enough informed to understand that this matter of national business is not the right means for expressing anti-government opinions.

When will the markets start into a run to cover their asse(t)s?

History and current international examples show that what we are doing is exactly backwards. If you want fiscal responsibility, act that way. And please stop calling rich people "job creators." That's not what they do with their money.

Friday, April 22, 2011

For the Children by Gary Snyder

The rising hills, the slopes,
of statistics
lie before us.
the steep climb
of everything, going up,
up, as we all
go down.

In the next century
or the one beyond that,
they say,
are valleys, pastures,
we can meet there in peace
if we make it.

To climb these coming crests
one word to you, to
you and your children:

stay together
learn the flowers
go light

~ Gary Snyder ~


(Turtle Island)

Awarded Ruth Lilly Poetry Prize, 2008,
for Lifetime Achievement in Poetry

Friday, July 2, 2010

Mark Morford Nails It.

In "The Last Tuna Nigiri on Earth" he has a Republican moment and then recovers.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2010/07/02/notes070210.DTL&nl=fix

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Is it just me, or is word usage and spelling going to hello in a sandbasket?

I have an unfortunate tendency to notice errors in spelling, usage, punctuation. I let some things bug me. Part of it is that I can see something that the other person apparently doesn't. What do I do with that?
Recently I have heard a lot of word misuse, often with the fancier sounding word substituted for the correct word. This shows up when people always use "so-and-so and I" even when it is an object in the sentence and the correct pronoun would be me.
"They took my friend and I to the beach." Aaaaarrgggh. Friend and ME! So my internal corrector says.
I think competence became competency in this way. I recently heard "methodological" when the appropriate word was "methodical."
Today I received an e-newsletter where the writer referred throughout to people "waiving" at each other. Many times. Spell check doesn't know when you use the wrong word.
Once I wrote to an e-sender to suggest she needed a proofreader. She asked for the basis of my comment so I sent her some examples. No reply or even thanks for the time it took me to do it. We don't like to be criticized. I just take advantage of those times when I am asked to edit copy, and make it my gift to friends.
I appreciate the kindness of those who take care of their language as it is easier for me to read!

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Drew Faust talk on Unscripted Life from Harvard Commencement

“By ancient and curious custom,” President Drew Faust told the graduating class of 2010 in her May 25 Baccalaureate address, “it falls to me to offer you a final sermon before you go.” Speaking from experience shared with the class—of grand plans rethought in the aftermath of “the biggest meltdown of world financial systems since the Great Depression”—Faust recounted the lesson learned: “Life never follows a script.” (Read the text of Faust’s address here.)

“We didn’t have to melt down the roof of Harvard Hall into bullets—as we did in 1775; but we did curtail plans,” Faust told the class, suggesting that the crisis is part of their education, that upheavals teach lessons.

“The first is about humility,” she said. “We have been forcefully reminded that we cannot control or even predict the future or what it will require of us…. The unforeseen events of the past two years have forced us to imagine the world differently; they have demanded that we adapt, and throw away the script we thought we were following. And they have reminded us once again of the value of the liberal arts, which are designed to prepare us for life without a script—for a life with any script.” The second lesson? “Embrace risk…Don’t settle for plan B until you have tried plan A,” Faust urged. Then, echoing a message that Bill Gates delivered on a visit a few weeks earlier, Faust said the third lesson is that “The world really needs you”—a lesson the class seems already to have absorbed, she added: “Nearly 20 percent of you applied for Teach for America—far more than at our peer institutions, and the largest percentage of any school class in the history of the organization.” And finally, Faust told her audience, the fourth lesson is that “living in a world without a script demands and rewards creativity.”

The address was full of historical references, but also touched with humor on current events. As freshmen, “Your accomplishments were legion….At least you said they were,” Faust joked, alluding to the widely reported story of a student admitted under false pretenses.

Faust went on to recount a few of the class’s notable accomplishments: the startup of an NGO that built a school for girls in Afghanistan; the creation of a senior-thesis film selected for screening at Cannes; the establishment of a sustainable water-supply system for a rural community in Ghana.

The service, a Harvard tradition since the seventeenth century, also included remarks from the Reverend Peter J. Gomes, Plummer professor of Christian morals and Pusey minister in the Memorial Church. It included readings from the Analects of Confucius, the Hebrew Bible, Hindu Scripture, the Holy Quran, and the New Testament.

As Gomes’s message in the program said, “The occasion is both joyful and solemn, intimate and public, filled with the exuberance of youth and sustained by venerable and weighty tradition.”

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Choices about Afghanistan

Hearing the positions as the government debates strategy for Afhanistan, I am

Sad that we are in a position of deciding how much war to carry out in someone else's country, spending tax dollars that are needed to rebuild our economy and social safety nets.

Sad that it will likely be perceived as invasion and occupation rather than assistance by most of the people who did not request help to become a democracy - and have fought off outsiders many times.

Concerned that, as Rep. Barbara Lee points out, Congress has transferred the power of declaring war to the White House.

And distantly hoping that our efforts will actually support a regime that affords women education and full participation.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

What the Years Get You

I'm staying with a friend at her apartment while on a business assignment away from home. She has two cats and a dog that I have come to know and look forward to petting when I get here. The guest room is familiar and inviting. She always has a few things on hand because she knows I enjoy them... like late night chocolate and seasonal berries for breakfast.
What I love about a friendship that has grown over years has been described by a poet in a line I vaguely recall as 'the unexpressible comfort'. We know how to say, Do you want some of this, are you done with your plate, what else do you need, without having to wonder whether we are overly imposing or being a 'good host.'
Both are committed to each other's happiness and comfort, and both are empathetic about life's imperfections and our own rambling paths.

We can have a light conversation or a deeper one. We can create separate apace in the apartment so she can get rest while I am on an earlier time zone. She can tell me what's important about locking the door or turning off lights so I can come and go. We can share understanding about the people and situations in our lives. We look forward to seeing each other and have a good time.

This is not rocket science, this is not fireworks or life-changing like falling in love. It is also not the same comfort I had with many friends when there were many friends around in the full press of adulthood. It is knowing who has stuck, who will accept me because they have done so, who holds a similar loyalty to me that I hold to them. It's not many people, it's not acquaintances. In addition to the friend I am visiting now, it's the few people with whom I will make plans and go visit or enthusiastically host.

It is a little bit of a surprise who my close friends are now, compared to the people with whom I spent many hours and passages assuming it would continue indefinitely. A few have stayed and we're easy.

This is what long term friendship turns out to be. A treasure that cannot be found except through the span of time.

Monday, July 13, 2009

Former Majority Attempts to Define Objectivity

As I listen to the opening statements by US Senators in the hearing to confirm Judge Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, I am taken aback by the premises expressed most strikingly by Republicans. They continue to assert that the Constitution is totally clear and can be interpreted objectively based on the text only and no personal opinion, and most amazingly, that the justices who agree with them are all completely objective. That 106 of 110 justices in the history of the court having been white and male would have had no impact on the decisions they made.

More than overt oppressive tactics such as arrests and censorship, the subtle and probably unconscious bias of thinking one's own opinions are objective is dangerous because of the inertia of the majority mindset.

Even though our population has shifted and the majority is on its way to minority status, our ruling bodies and our common thinking and beliefs still unconsciously hold that there is objective reality which happens to correspond to what we think. And to unconsciously support an economic system that slants toward greed and war.

This observation motivates me to promote a) thinking about thinking, i.e. self-reflection without being self-confirming, or closed, and b) interaction with people in the world as equals in importance though not in talents or privileges.
I believe that intelligence is self-questioning, without being doubtful, and that it grows through contact with the many ways of living on this planet.

If we are to be ready for interaction with anyone from another galaxy, let's think ahead and practice welcoming behaviors here where we reside. And one of them would be understanding the spectrum of possible belief systems and ways to live.

Please, Senators who hold great legislative and social-political power, recognize that RIGHT is not a functional place to stand if you are to do your job in this system. Reflect on the hypocrisy and scandal that plagues people who take the righteous ownership of reality. Find a path to the humility that does not bow or scrape but does think beyond slogans and expands understanding of what it means to be human.

Saturday, May 23, 2009

59 years, 364 days so far

Having been here for just shy of 60 years, I have learned a couple of things.

What goes around truly does come around. Just because it feels good to do good.

Friends and gratitude bring you everything else.

No one else can answer your questions.

Traveling to distant places is worth it.

Be still and breathe. Spend time with yourself.

Don't believe the naysayers.

You are loved more than you know.

Monday, May 11, 2009

No more 'others': Gates and the Dalai Lama on GPS

What is possible in a world where we need to maintain destructive force to keep 'others' from getting it themselves?
Fareed Zakaria always impresses me with the depth and intelligence of his interviews. Last week his guest was Defense Secretary Robert Gates, a sane voice in our military. He explained the role of a superpower (us) in keeping the peace through maintaining a nuclear arsenal. He said the purpose of our continued might is 'to prevent others getting nuclear weapons.' He meant that any other power could get the weapons, with any agenda including total destruction of everything. I follow the logic.
I took the thought about 'others' further to find a way out of the conundrum of having weapons to protect us from people who might get weapons. I thought about the projected, 'dark-side'sense of others, where we place our fears and hatreds and against whom we attack and defend ourselves.
When we distance other people or see them as the shadow, and when 'others' see us that way, we perpetuate the possibility of enmity. When everyone knows and feels there are no 'others', we won't need enormous destructive power to protect everyone.
How can we not have others? At heart, we are all one. People love being free to do their best, free of corruption. When they are living in poverty or oppression, they don't have that choice. I really believe that everyone wants to be free. In that way we are all one.
There are big IF's that make the difference in whether we can ever get to worldwide peace. IF people are not so resigned to separation from self that they shut down their humanness. IF people are not 'born to lose' or 'born to be evil,'which I believe they are not. Is our prison population huge because of our freedoms, or because of the high level of alienation in our society and class system?
In any case, a huge majority would agree and would strive to live in accordance with peace.
What would the world be like if we felt that "others" and ourselves were all bringing our best contribution to the way we all want to live? Would there be enough trust and connection in the world that we wouldn't need to spend our resources to prevent outbreaks of hate - against the OTHER?
This week, Fareed hosted the Dalai Lama, who said it for us, "There is no them."
If we, the US, are what Madeleine Albright called "the indispensable power," we maintain the separation, playing the role of Rescuer. If Americans can do anything to move us toward oneness, it would be to increase our generosity and share the power.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

A Willingness to Participate

We could feel it, the flowing of love and acceptance among people. The receiving of blessings. The release from cynicism. The need for action.
A poem by Alice Walker telling us that the world has indeed changed. Energy beings showing up at a psychic reading to say that humankind has shifted to a higher vibration. News from Jamaica that folks were celebrating as if it were their own government. The safe transition of power from one regime to the next. Unwavering messages from Obama as he takes sure steps into office. At this moment I do not need to say, "Not in my name!"

Here is Alice Walker's message

This one was read by Alice Walker on Democracy Now for the Inaugural
ALICE WALKER: A poem honoring the people who don’t believe this is happening. I wanted to write a poem for the people who are still saying, “Oh, no, this can’t happen,” you know, because all along the line of this struggle to get Barack Obama to the White House, people feared that something awful would happen to him, and so many people hold so many angers and pains that they just can’t believe today. So this is a poem for the people who basically don’t believe that it’s happening. It’s called “The World Has Changed.”

The World Has Changed:
Wake up & smell
The possibility.
The world
Has changed:
It did not
Change
Without
Your prayers
Without
Your faith
Without
Your determination
To
Believe
In liberation
&
Kindness;
Without
Your
Dancing
Through the years
That
Had
No
Beat.
The world has changed:
It did not
Change
Without
Your
Numbers
Your
Fierce
Love
Of self
&
Cosmos
It did not
Change
Without
Your
Strength.
The world has
Changed:
Wake up!
Give yourself
The gift
Of a new
Day.
The world has changed:
This does not mean that
You were never
Hurt.
The world
Has changed:
Rise!
Yes
&
Shine!
Resist the siren
Call
Of
Disbelief.
The world has changed:
Don’t let
Yourself
Remain
Asleep
To
It.

AMY GOODMAN: Alice Walker, the Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist, reading her poem “The World Has Changed.”

Monday, September 15, 2008

report card on the neoconservative movement

from a comment on the Daily Kos
The nation has learned at great, tragic cost that conservatives can't be trusted to prevent terrorist attacks, bring the top Al-qaeda kingpin to justice, wisely initiate and manage foreign wars, or control spending. Now, with the benefit of empirical hindsight, perhaps it's time to publicly recognize what everyone now knows: conservatism doesn't work at home, either.

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Charlie Wilson's War - movie

Thank you, Tom Hanks and friends... saw Charlie Wilson's War on Christmas Day with family.
For once, no one got into criticizing the plot, acting, or cinematography.

The story is so recent (and current), I am absorbing the messy processes of government and international deal-making, the scenes of airplanes and helicopters hunting people from the air in the Russian invasion of Afghanistan, small bands of fighters shooting back with heat-seeking missiles fired from the ground, and the odd alliance of right-wing Texans and middle eastern rival states, as well as scenes of decadence from the 80's.

The bottom line, the point made at the very end of the movie, the sad truth, that we couldn't muster the resources to help rebuild, advance or provide humanitarian assistance to people caught in conflict, made me grateful to Tom Hanks for choosing this vehicle while the middle east continues to struggle. I breathed a sigh and said quietly, "We have a lot of work to do."

Arriving home I saw the article in the newspaper about our difficulties allocating and administering $750 million over five years to a mountainous region in the tribal areas of Pakistan. Characters from the movie went through my mind as I read about an area so dangerous that US officials, contractors, and international NGO's don't have access. No one has the power or stability to monitor the funding or the projects which have been put out to bid. Most funds don't make it through the corrupt local governments and are as likely to be used for more toy mines that will maim and kill children as for schools or roads.

None of it is simple or clear. The bigger ideal, a world where peace prevails while people can air their differences openly,
educate and care for children and elders, and appreciate culture and nature, must be actively recalled and visioned so we can avoid falling into the angry divisiveness that still holds sway in so many minds.

"One love, one heart. Let's get together and feel all right." --Bob Marley

Wishing a happy and safe 2008 to all beings.

Friday, September 14, 2007

Watching War TV

Whether for or against it, we are seeing and hearing war, supporting war, and analyzing what to do about war. We are paying the weapons dealers and contractors and wasting our idealistic young people as well as theirs.
In whatever way it comes about, shifting consciousness as well as what is happening 'on the ground' as they say, we must raise the vibration so that invading homes and nations becomes a thing of the past.
We must find our center so it can hold while the thrashing about takes place.
Back to political TV.